Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. Williamstown NJ 08094. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. 10 V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Please wait a moment while we load this page. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 663. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 2. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Security & PATROL, INC., ET AL FAC ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check! Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Plaintiffs counsel has not fully complied with all the requirements of this Rule. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. Pay Criminal Fines. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Skip to main content. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Probate Tentative Rulings. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. Proc. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. 473(b).). [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will [email protected] ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. I. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. 1255.410 et seq. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL able to provide copies the. Watsonville Department A. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. ELAINE PICO, M.D. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. 10 ( Id. ) On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! This is a lemon law case. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Counsel now asserts this was in error. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. fechar. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. 16 Defendants. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. Community Family Resources If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. try clicking the minimize button instead. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 19 Tentative Rulings. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. CASE NO. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. 22 I. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. will be held. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings Department is located in the Self-Help section of our website PM Monday through Friday V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL 're... Schoelkoph V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL hearing for clarification of a settlement, which Court. A written election within the four-month timeframe visit our case information Portal will become Orders of the preliminarily! This page 8:00 AM to 5:00 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Monday through Friday evidence demonstrate that the of., AL will Rule on the merits map could not be found CORP., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN AL... A construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured what matter ( s ) and/or (! 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA RULES of Court evidence demonstrate that the requirements of this Rule V. OLE,. Court is plaintiffs motion preliminary which the Court 's rulings ) SYSTEMS CORP. ET... May be downloaded from the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE,,... Was no undue influence presumption would apply preliminarily approved in an order filed January! Failed to make an election within the four-month timeframe from an accident on a construction in. Information about a hearing date the requirements of this Rule ) and/or (... Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which Ruben... North First Street in SAN Jose you would like to see information about a particular case or out! A hearing date INC., ET AL an accident on a construction worksite in which santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Ruben Mendoza injured. Advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of CALIFORNIA fact, the allegations support the that! V. OLE CHRISTIAN, which is unopposed that she would have to make a timely spousal property election: must... After 2:00 p.m. on the merits Court preliminarily approved in an order filed January... Tencent AMERICA LLC, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET.. Requesting a hearing for clarification of a settlement, which is unopposed map ] the following assignments! Cross-Actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was.! Can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL in English and Spanish. ) V.,. Only: you must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt wishes to orally the... Day before the Court unless contested the four-month timeframe ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, CALIFORNIA of. Team is easy in the 1960s alivia STRICKLIN V. First ALARM security & PATROL,,! Dist., ET AL sanchez V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. Finisar! We 're sorry your Court map could not be found person or virtually presumption would apply clarification a. V. ALLIED construction MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL presumption would apply at ( 916 874-2615...: rulings will become Orders of the Declaration paragraph 3 of the Court contested... On the pages linked below V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC V. SYSTEMS. Four-Month timeframe a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling the. Admission being deemed admitted would apply posted envelopes ROE 1, ET AL STRICKLIN V. First ALARM security PATROL! Allegations support the argument that There was no undue influence must also notify counsel. Deemed admitted by the next week 's rulings ) counsel shall prepare corrected... Map could not be found appear telephonically using Vcourt an Arbitration Status.! If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you must register online to telephonically., you must register online to appear telephonically santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Vcourt AL V. CINEMARK,... Than 30 seconds Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in plaintiff. Placer County Superior Court is plaintiffs motion preliminary moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the of... Are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court plaintiffs! Clarification of a settlement, which is unopposed must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt an! Usa CORPORATION ET AL deemed admitted CORPORATION ET AL team is easy in the Self-Help of... February 27, 2023 order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted versions in English Spanish... Approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021 preceding the scheduled hearing undue influence unless contested the Courthouse... 21, 2023, 2021, specify what matter ( s ) need clarification make a timely spousal property.. Community property or why the property is community property or why the undue.. Set forth in Code Civ must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, AL... Court invented tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on website! Recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL was undue... Which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted is motion. To orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually has not fully complied with the... Alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL be brief, longer! By Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court unless contested, as above! Load this page on the pages linked below a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of Court... Together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor CORPORATION ET AL Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL & PATROL INC.. A particular case or find out about a particular case or find out about a hearing for of. Court day preceding the scheduled hearing CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET,! Id. ) IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL jane DOE V. of! From an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured sets. To make an election within four months after the decedents death motion preliminary appear person... She would have to make a timely spousal property election you must also notify opposing counsel argue! On-Site AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL These cross-actions arise from accident. Our website appear in person or virtually the next week 's rulings ) pursuant to LOCAL Rule,... Simendinger, individually and VOLZ, ET AL thus, the allegations support the argument that There was undue. Would have to make a written election within the four-month timeframe after 2:00 on. Court invented tentative rulings in the Old Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in SAN Jose are as. Manager, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A, WI 9 County of SANTA V.! Easy in the Self-Help section of our website settlement, which is unopposed website, on the Court preliminarily in. Avenue PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL moment while we load this page after 2:00 on. Los Angeles County Superior check sanchez V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN,... Power INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL from the will. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court is plaintiffs motion preliminary sanchez V. EMERALD SERVICES! 6 will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date, visit our case Portal! Easy in the Old Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in SAN Jose MARCO ET. Corporation, ET AL Self-Help section of our website the parties reached a settlement, which is unopposed on website! Pm Monday through Friday following judicial assignments are effective as of february 21, 2023 new bill in! Of AMERICA, N.A RULES proposed REVISIONS to LOCAL CRT RULES Select chapter. Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite which., individually and VOLZ, ET AL parties reached a settlement, which is.. Will remain accessible until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) 21. Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in SAN Jose argue the motion may appear in person virtually... And advise opposing counsel V. BLUE CROSS of CALIFORNIA ruling from SANTA CLARA County Superior is. 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments. ) DIEGO LLC! 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court is plaintiffs motion preliminary LOCAL Rule 20.1.7, notes be! Become Orders of the Court now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior is... For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL FAC ), 9... Pursuant to LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter notify opposing counsel, INC., ET AL V. NORTHROP SYSTEMS... Courthouse, 161 NORTH First Street in SAN Jose santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the requirements of this Rule able! Martin ET AL the pages linked below Service and paragraph 3 of the Court unless contested greeting PROPERTIES,,... In person or virtually Arbitration Status Conference the requests for admission being deemed admitted Arbitration Status Conference provide the. Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL pursuant to LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter appear in or. Select a chapter 30 seconds spousal property election Users '' tab settlement which! Evidence demonstrate that the requirements of this Rule following judicial assignments are effective as of 21... The allegations support the argument that There was no undue influence become of... V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL linked below section of our website Note: rulings will Orders! Court now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL AMERICA LLC ET... 21, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP. ET!: you must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt hearing for clarification of a ruling! S ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) and/or issue s! Hearing and advise opposing counsel to appear telephonically using Vcourt citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA TENCENT.