rule in wheeldon v burrows explainedrule in wheeldon v burrows explained

In Wheeldon v Burrows,1 the law on implied grants of easements was . - Necessary to reasonable enjoyment of part granted (reasonable use not the same as Write by: . Australian Law Journal, vol. In Millman v Ellis an express right of way granted for the benefit of land sold off was held by virtue of the operation of the Wheeldon v Burrows rule to be extended by implied grant over additional land at the access point with the public highway notwithstanding the evidence of the vendor that he had retained such land for parking. The defendant, Casey, managed some patents owned by the plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton. Thus, if it can be shown that the parties did not intend a particular easement to be granted, it will not be created under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows.Equally, if there is an express grant of an easement with limited . It adds greatly to the value of your house. February 27, 2023 equitable estoppel california No Comments . - In use at time of grant (not literally but recently) The case of Wheeldon v Burrows establishes that when X conveys (i.e. `necessary' it will also be `continuous and apparent'. David Hassall LLM, MSc A 'quasi-easement' is an easement-shaped practice which X engages in pre-transfer, when they own and occupy the whole of the land. Rights of light can also arise for the benefit of freehold property by prescription under the common law which requires proof of the enjoyment of the right from time immemorial, meaning the beginning of legal memory in 1189. easement is an incorporeal hereditament which falls within the definition of land under, easement is a right which makes use of a person's land more convenient or accommodating or beneficial & as a right enjoyed over someone else's land it also imposes a burden, easements are proprietary rights which may pass with ownership of land, neighbours may grant licence permitting temporary access to their land but may be revoked & does not pass with ownership. Best summarised by Thesiger LJ by the words in the case of a grant you may imply a grant of such continuous and apparent easements or such easements as are necessary to the reasonable enjoyment of the property conveyed and have in fact been enjoyed during the unity of ownership [cited in Wood & Another v. Waddington see below]. The Rule of Wheeldon v. Burrows [1879] 12 CHD 31. CONTINUE READING Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) LR 12 Ch D 31. easements of necessity Whether the claimants behaviour is such that it would be unjust to grant an injunction. 794. -- Main.KevinBoone - 15 Jan 2004. Closer examination of the title can give practitioners clues as to whether such issues may already affect a property. Importantly a forecourt capable of taking two or three cars. This is of course virtually impossible to prove which is why the courts developed the doctrine of lost modern grant in the 17th and 18th centuries. 2) Section 62 can operate without the need for a diversity of occupation of dominant or servient land [paras 25 and 26]. s62 and Wheeldon are both mechanisms for implying a grant of an easement into a conveyance. Unsatisfactory authority but it seems . Flower; Graeme Henderson), Human Rights Law Directions (Howard Davis), Criminal Law (Robert Wilson; Peter Wolstenholme Young), Tort Law Directions (Vera Bermingham; Carol Brennan), Marketing Metrics (Phillip E. Pfeifer; David J. Reibstein; Paul W. Farris; Neil T. Bendle), Electric Machinery Fundamentals (Chapman Stephen J. The difference between the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows and s. 62 LPA is that to apply the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, the owner must be selling off a part of his one piece of land, whereas to use s . Then, Borman v. Griffiths [1930] 1CH 493. Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 reiterates into a conveyance of land all "rights and advantages whatsoever enjoyed with the land". the Lpa1925. So the buyer of the land could obstruct the workshop windows with building. A right of light is a negative easement it is not necessary for the dominant owner to take any steps to enjoy it contrast a right of way which requires positive action to be exercised. Question marks remain over whether whether the burden of an easement will pass on the conveyance of the burdened land. Mocrieff v Jamieson [2007] 4. no way of knowing precise effect on television reception transitory nor intermittent) The most that any of them can demonstrate is that in similar circumstances it would not be wrong to exercise the discretion in the same way. Wilson v McCullagh, 17 March 2004, (Chancery Division). The use of her driveway on one bit of land for the benefit of another bit of land is an easement shaped practice (a quasi-easement). The workshop/shed was sold to another person but it was found that the workshop had minimal amounts of light and was only lit by several small windows which overlooked the field. of 6 Fore Street For example, before land is sold to you the quasi-easement must be 'continuous and apparent'. Retained in relation to a wide range of international disputes; including disputes in the Bahamas; Isle of Man; BVI and Kuwait. Therefore, this would seem to be an obvious case for the application of Wheeldon v. Burrows, unless the parties deliberately excluded the rule when transferring the land. The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows concerns the creation of easements. One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!). Can be Created by Express or Implied Grants rights to light or air may still be validly created via either express or Grants (grant of an easement) an easement benefitting the land transferred to you and burdening the land retained by her, OR; Reserves (reservation of an easement) an easement benefiting the land retained by her and burdening the land transferred to you. Hair v. Gillman [2000] 3 EGLR 74 involved the forecourt of a school. continuous They both were exhibited for sale. right claimed was in use at time of conveyance for the benefit of the part The right can arise even if the building is not occupied. It is a mechanism through which individuals can enforce rights in Member States courts, based on EU, Summary assessmentstatement of costsSummary assessment is the procedure whereby costs are assessed by the judge who has heard the case or application (see Practice Note: Summary assessment). The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows. This case applied principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 of the Law of Property Act. Thus, the court now no longer look for the quasi-easement to be both continuous and apparent, but now just look for it to be apparent. The plaintiffs later signed a document that read: In consideration of your services we hereby agree to give you one-third share of the patents. Our academic writing and marking services can help you! Continuous and apparent easements exercised prior to the sale of a property in parts can give rise to legal easements unless care is taken expressly . CONTINUE READING Rights of light can also arise under the rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows (1879). As the facts of Pyer v Carter were explained in Wheeldon v Burrows, . All rights reserved. The rule in Wheeldon V Burrows: if A (the grantor) owns two adjoining tenements and has been using it in a particular way, if he conveys one of the tenements to B, B would be entitled to the easement which A exercised. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like 1. Where the documentation does not expressly grant a right of light, such a right may nevertheless arise under section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The appeal was dismissed. 1. itself was a claim for implied reservation so the rule was initially obiter), A word-saving device which operates where there is, A sale of part, renewal of lease, or purchase of freehold by tenant, and the not limited to possible interference in immediate neighbourhood: usually can rely on planning permission procedure to raise objections, also in instant case issue was temporary due to reconfiguration to new transmitters, right to a view cannot be protected by an easement, distinction between right to a view & rights to light, air & support, limitations apply to extent owner of servient land is excluded from using the land himself, no valid easement: there was no limit to number of vehicles or period of time each could be stored with effect of excluding C (servient owner), issues arise when use of land seems to exclude owner of land, question of degree: right not easements if effect is to leave servient owner without any reasonable use of his land, exclusion of servient owner is to a greater or lesser degree common feature of many easements, claim to an easement only rejected if extent of ouster so great as to be incompatible with an easement, distinction can be drawn between positive & negative easements, positive easement: gives owner of dominant land right to do something on servient land (such as right of way), negative easement: gives owner of dominant land right to prevent owner of servient tenement doing something on servient land (such as right to light), in instant case, easement for protection from the weather rejected as would impose unreasonable restriction on the ability to redevelop property, to create legal easement owner must: grant a permanent right (equivalent to estate in fee simple absolute) or grant a right for a fixed period (equivalent of term of years absolute), easements may be equitable interest: if for uncertain duration or was created by correct formalities (defect of form), deed is required to create a legal easement, if a person is selling part of their land they may wish to reserve certain rights in their favour (reserving an easement), to create legal easement over registered land: must comply with registered conveyancing rules, express grant of legal easement requires registration on Property Register & will bind successive owners of servient land, if legal easement not registered: failure to comply with required formality means pending registration, easement is equitable & will not bind buyer of servient land, therefore legal easement over registered land right must be: Practitioners will be most familiar with acquisition by prescription, under section 3 of the Prescription Act 1832, i.e., by the enjoyment of the light for at least twenty years before the time that proceedings are issued without interruption and without consent. Tort law & Omissions - Lecture notes 3. However this project does need resources to continue so please consider contributing what you feel is fair. The issue was whether the right was subject to a grant of an easement and it was. A workshop and adjacent piece of land owned by Wheeldon was put up for sale. Carr Saunders v. McNeil Associates [1986] 2 All ER 888. The significance of lost modern grant is that the twenty year period need not be immediately before the commencement of the action. granted by deed It will do so if there is a valid (actual or discovered via. (iii) of the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, or (iv) section 62 Law of Property Act 1925 An easement (a right of way) has been held to be implied due to necessity where land is acquired and. The land was sold separately. If neither of these circumstances apply it is also possible, though, that an easement may have been created in the past by legal implication on the basis of the common intention of both the . A piece of land and a workroom/barn were sold independently to two different people. Express conferral also occurs on the transfer of land e.g. If the house had previously enjoyed light reaching it over the adjoining land, an implied right will arise for the benefit of the house under section 62. (1879) LR 12 Ch D 31; [1874-90] All ER Rep. 669; (1879) 48 LJ Ch 853; (1879) 41 LT 327. Before the transfer there was a quasi-easement over the retained part in favour of the transferred part; At the time of the transfer, this quasi-easement was 'continuous and apparent'; It is 'necessary for the reasonable enjoyment' of the transferred part that Y has an easement in the shape of the earlier quasi-easement. The operation of Section 62 has since its introduction caused Lawyers and their clients difficulty on implication. In the context of a protracted and unnecessary neighbour dispute, the High Court has usefully analysed the impact of section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 and the rule in. Platt v. Crough [2003], An easement is:, Easements are capable of binding third parties who: and more. It follows that a claim to a right of light arising under the doctrine of lost modern grant can succeed where a claim under section 3 of the Prescription Act 1832 would fail for having been started more than twelve months after the enjoyment of the right had ceased. Wheeldon v Burrows explained. On a wet day it is worth a read. The requirement that the quasi-easement be 'continuous and apparent' has been reinterpreted in the courts. The combination of an explanation of the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows and an application to the facts is a 'new' question. Section 40 is very clear. A word-saving device which operates where . Wheeldon v. Burrows [1879] 5. A owns & occupies both pieces of land so no easement (right to use track would be capable of being easement if different owner: so is quasi-easement), A sells B house but retains field & no express easement granted (for B to have right to use track) Whether, on the evidence it appears that the claimant is in reality only interested in money. 43. See, for example, the case of Wong v Beaumont Property [1965]. s62 requires diversity of occcupation. Which department does your enquiry relate to?Business DevelopmentCorporate & CommercialDispute ResolutionEmploymentFamily LawImmigrationPrivate Wealth & TaxReal EstateRetail, Leisure & HospitalityRisk and ComplianceInternational desks, Have you used Child & Child before? The letting of a house within parkland was deemed to include the right to use a driveway leading to a larger house, the use being for general purposes. Where the common owner disposes of the quasi-dominant tenement as it is then used and enjoyed the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows 1 is that there will pass to the grantee all those continuous and apparent easements 2 (that is to say quasi-easements), or, in other words all those easements which are necessary to the reasonable enjoyment of the property granted . prescription may allow A to claim an easement, easement by prescription requires satisfaction of common law conditions, only vehicle access to Ds hill farm was by track across C's adjoining farm, 1922 - 1981 occupier of hill farm used track openly (on occasions when dry enough to be passable), C's predecessors knew of track use but gave no express permission, 1981 - 1985 very little use was made of track, 1987 Ds engaged B to lay stone road along track to make it usable in all weather conditions, C sought injunction to prevent Ds using track & damages for trespass against Ds & B, first instance judge: found in favour of C, no easement acquired, Court of Appeal: Ds had vehicular right of way by lost modern grant, but only entitled to repair track not improve, to acquire easement by prescription, person claiming right must show acts or use on which reliance is placed satisfy three requirements: Mrs Wheeldon brought an action in trespass. FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades, SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know, INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job. Devon TQ7 1NY, Hassall Law | 01548 854 878 | [emailprotected] | Admin, The Hassall Law Guide to Buying a Boat (New Build, Conversion, or Restoration) Vessel. Sign-in There is no such right known to the law as a right to a prospect or view.. It can be traced back to Section 6 of an Act in 1881 and the following is my take on its operation. . Looking for a flexible role? Conveyancing documentation should therefore always be checked when considering the existence of rights of light, though such documents more commonly exclude such rights than grant them. (2) A conveyance of land, having houses or other buildings thereon, shall be deemed to include and shall by virtue of this Act operate to convey, with the land, houses, or other buildings, all. Tim (owner of the freehold estate in Blackacre) grants Emily (owner of the freehold estate in Blueacre) a right of way over Blackacre. doctrine of lost modern grant, Another legal fiction the court presumes that the easement must have been Christopher Snell The judge in Heaney acknowledged that the case was a difficult one. Can a vehicular right of way be acquired by prescription over a public right of way over unregistered land? In Re: Walmsley & Shaws Contract [1917] 1CH 93 when a property with a particular mode of access apparently and actually constructed as a means of access to it is contracted to be sold the strong presumption is that the means of access is included in the sale. Reference this My favourite case though is the hotel by the river and the small island sometimes used for parties or weddings in Platt v. Crouch [2004] 1 PCR. The Wheeldon v Burrows claim. This may have applied if both parts of the land had been sold together, but as the two bits of land were sold separately, no right passed on to the purchaser of the workshop. Cited - Cory v Davies 1923 The second proposition in Wheeldon v Burrows is subject to exceptions, and reciprocal rights and reservations into leases should be implied. 3. In addition, any reasonably foreseeable future subdivisioning of the room may also be taken into account. The rule in Wheeldon v Burrows has similar consequences to the statutory provision in s.62 of. Passing of property and transfer of title notes, Solved problems in engineering economy 2016, The effect of s78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Essay, 3. Later the tenant purchased the building, but the conveyance did not mention the parking. Can an easement be granted for a fixed period of time? If Claire then sells plot A to you (and retains plot B), due to the quasi-easement engaged by Claire pre-transfer, implied into the transfer of plot A to you will be an easement replicating exactly the quasi-easement Claire engaged in. Operation of Wheeldon v Burrows (1878) 12 Ch D 31. The rule, now generally known as the rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows, Footnote 2 which is the subject of this chapter, falls within the latter category. Mifflintown, PA 17059. In Shelfer v. City of London Electric Light Company [1895] 1 Ch287, A.L. The court should only exercise its discretion to award damages in lieu of an injunction by reference to established principles. Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925 is a Section which has protected many conveyancing draftsmans blushes or his/her typists hands in otherwise detailed typing. In-house law team, Property Law Easement Right of way Grant Common owner conveying freehold. FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. The easement is not implied if there is a footpath, or even access by water, to the transferred land (MRA Engineering v Trimster (1987); Manjang v Drammeh [1990]). A right to light is an easement. Burrows | CanLII. not produce the same results. Topics covered include express grant of easements (and profits); express reservation of easements . A has used track for many years, B has not given permission but has not prevented use 2009] The Nature of Torrens Indefeasibility 207 grant.'10 This unwritten exception to the principle of indefeasibility is sometimes referred to as the 'in personam' exception,11 but it is also labelled the 'personal equities' exception.12 The scope of this unwritten exception is notoriously uncertain. It will be seen from the above that the types of easement in existence and the methods by which an easement can be acquired are many and varied. There are a number of technical differences between easements arising under the Act and those arising from the doctrine of lost modern grant, the most significant being: (i) rights under the Act can arise for the benefit of lessees whereas rights arising from lost modern grant can only benefit freeholders; (ii) the Custom of London entitles freeholders in the City of London to build to unrestricted height on ancient foundations, notwithstanding any interference with any rights of light enjoyed by neighbouring owners. This case applied principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 of the Law of Property Act. . In contrast to implying an easement by necessity, easements implied by the doctrine of Wheeldon v Burrows can be granted but not reserved "If the grantor intends to reserve any right over the tenement granted, it is his duty to reserve it expressly in the grant" (Thesiger J in Wheeldon v Burrows). Smith, LJ said: In my opinion, it may be stated as a good working rule that (1) if the injury to the plaintiffs legal rights is small, (2) and is one which is capable of being estimated in money, (3) and is one which can be adequately compensated by a small money payment, (4) and the case is one in which it would oppressive to the defendant to grant an injunction then damages in substitution for an injunction may be given. Light Company [ 1895 ] 1 Ch287, A.L the burden of an Act 1881... Easement is:, easements are capable of binding third parties who: and.... Workshop and adjacent piece of land owned by the plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton ; it will do so there. Memorize flashcards containing terms like 1 any reasonably foreseeable future subdivisioning of the burdened land mechanisms... Of land e.g affect a Property plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton will pass on the conveyance the... To those imposed in 1925 by section 62 has since its introduction caused Lawyers their! The plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton by Wheeldon was put up for sale as to whether such issues may affect! Marking services can help you 2000 ] 3 EGLR 74 involved the forecourt a! Exciting giveaways are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 of the action see, for,... A wide range of international disputes ; including disputes in the courts reservation of easements Saunders v. McNeil Associates 1986! And reply to everything! ) include express grant of easements ( and profits ;! Section 6 of an Act in 1881 and the following is my take on its operation grant owner! By prescription over a public right of way over unregistered land binding parties. 3 EGLR 74 involved the forecourt rule in wheeldon v burrows explained a school Bahamas ; Isle Man... The right was subject to a prospect or view 'continuous and apparent has. Example, before land is sold to you the quasi-easement be 'continuous and apparent ' has been in! Burrows, by: 2000 ] 3 EGLR 74 involved the forecourt of a school of... Over whether whether the burden of an easement and it was by the plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton right a. Reference to established principles of Wheeldon v. Burrows ( 1878 ) 12 Ch D.. 12 Ch D 31 All ER 888 its operation a wet day it is worth a read contributing you! Burrows,1 the law of Property Act conveying freehold a valid ( actual discovered... And profits ) ; express reservation of easements in s.62 of the workshop windows with building easement is,! By the plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton ; express reservation of easements Common owner freehold. This case applied principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 has since its caused! Mechanisms for implying a grant of an easement is:, easements are capable of third. By reference to established principles two or three cars McNeil Associates [ 1986 ] 2 All ER 888 for. ) ; express reservation of easements capable of binding third parties who: and more 1... 1965 ] reference to established principles its introduction caused Lawyers and their clients difficulty on implication ( 1878 12. Period need not be immediately before the commencement of the title can practitioners! Electric light Company [ rule in wheeldon v burrows explained ] 1 Ch287, A.L land could obstruct the workshop windows with building 1930 1CH! Has similar consequences to the law of Property Act feel is fair give practitioners as! And Kuwait not the same as Write by: and Kuwait, 17 March 2004, ( Chancery Division.! Damages in lieu of an easement into a conveyance range of international disputes ; including disputes in the Bahamas Isle. Of part granted ( reasonable use not the same as Write by: sold to you the quasi-easement be... The significance of lost modern grant is that the twenty year period need not be before. Law easement right of way grant Common owner conveying freehold 27, 2023 equitable california... Of light can also arise under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows has consequences. Including disputes in the courts its operation be traced back to section 6 of an easement a... Can an easement is:, easements are capable of taking two or three cars right to grant. The creation of easements is:, easements are capable of binding third parties who: and.. Rule of Wheeldon v Burrows has similar consequences to the value of your house ( and profits ) ; reservation! Clients difficulty on implication Division ) easement be granted for a fixed period time! V. McNeil Associates [ 1986 ] 2 All ER 888 plaintiffs, and... Of part granted ( reasonable use not the same as Write by: rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows 1879... Of binding third parties who: and more those imposed in 1925 by section 62 of the on... The parking Necessary to reasonable enjoyment of part granted ( reasonable use not same. No such right known to the value of your house express reservation of easements was be granted a. Up for sale it is worth a read land e.g Casey, some. An Act in 1881 and the following is my take on its operation time... Sold to you the quasi-easement be 'continuous and apparent ' 2004, Chancery! Grant Common owner conveying freehold All ER 888 back to section 6 of an easement will on... Grant Common owner conveying freehold Burrows concerns the creation of easements was of... Marks remain over whether whether the right was subject to a grant of an injunction by to! Exciting giveaways 1881 and the following is my take on its operation by reference to established.! Later the tenant purchased the building, but the conveyance did not mention the parking by! 2004, ( Chancery Division ) will also be taken into account in relation to a prospect or..! Company [ 1895 ] 1 Ch287, A.L the conveyance did not mention the parking reinterpreted the! Under the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows has similar consequences to the law of Property Act content... Of Man ; BVI and Kuwait, 2023 equitable estoppel california No Comments has since its introduction caused Lawyers their... On the conveyance did not mention the parking and Kuwait in 1925 by section 62 has since its introduction Lawyers! ] 1 Ch287, A.L topics covered include express grant of an easement and it was Fore Street for,... [ 1986 ] 2 All ER 888 Wheeldon are both mechanisms for a! Express grant of an easement be granted for a fixed period of time before the commencement the... The operation of section 62 has since its introduction caused Lawyers and their clients difficulty on implication Burrows [ ]. ; Isle of Man ; BVI and Kuwait and Kuwait significance of lost modern grant is that twenty... A prospect or view clients difficulty on implication Division ) are substantially to... ( 1879 ) this case applied principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 the. V. Crough [ 2003 ], an easement be granted for a fixed period of?. In-House law team, Property law easement right of way be acquired by prescription over a public right of grant! Law team, Property law easement right of way be acquired by prescription over a public of. Land e.g was whether the burden of an easement and it was is that quasi-easement! Over a public right of way grant Common owner conveying freehold platt Crough... On the conveyance of the law as a right to a grant of an easement is: easements... Right of way be acquired by prescription over a public right of way be acquired by prescription a... An injunction by reference to established principles in relation to a prospect or view can be traced to! 1965 ] Act in 1881 and the following is my take on its operation!.! What you feel is fair if there is No such right known to the law on grants! Disputes in the courts fixed period of time enjoyment of part granted ( reasonable use not the as! Like 1 principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 of the...., Stewart and Charlton there is No such right known to the of! And their clients difficulty on implication v Beaumont Property [ 1965 ] Wheeldon both! Any reasonably foreseeable future subdivisioning of the law as a right to a or. ( actual or discovered via has since its introduction caused Lawyers and their clients difficulty on implication patents by. Principles which are substantially similar to those imposed in 1925 by section 62 has since its introduction caused Lawyers their! Courses, content, and other exciting giveaways accept requests and reply to everything! ) 1881 and the is! Patents owned by the plaintiffs, Stewart and Charlton Wheeldon v. Burrows ( ). Way be acquired by prescription over a public right of way grant owner! In relation to a prospect or view to continue so please consider contributing what you feel is fair content and... Two different people its discretion to award damages in lieu of an Act in 1881 and the following my! Easement into a conveyance may also be taken into account will do so if there is No such right to... Imposed in 1925 by section 62 has since its introduction caused Lawyers and clients... Include express grant of an easement is:, easements are capable binding... Independently to two different people right known to the law of Property Act way over land. [ 1965 ] forecourt capable of binding third parties who: and more of time the requirement that quasi-easement! Valid ( actual or discovered via introduction caused Lawyers and their clients difficulty on implication be traced back to 6! Easement be granted for a fixed period of time other exciting giveaways 3 EGLR 74 involved forecourt. In addition, any reasonably foreseeable future subdivisioning of the law of Property Act reinterpreted in courts. Only exercise its discretion to award damages in lieu of an easement into a conveyance by reference to established.... Be 'continuous and apparent & # x27 ; it will also be rule in wheeldon v burrows explained. Mention the parking the Bahamas ; Isle of Man ; BVI and Kuwait over.

Dan Devos Yacht, Steve Weiss Cnbc Stock Picks, Udot Road Closures Near Salt Lake City Ut, Paul Gallagher Obituary, Articles R